Melanoma
Cancer is a fungus – listen to Alexia talk about the total cure from the cancer that was on her ear. www.cancerisafungus.com
Suggested Products for:Melanoma
Surgery in Breast Cancer and Melanoma: Handbooks in General Surgery 
Surgery in Breast Cancer and Melanoma provides an illustrative, instructive, and comprehensive review that depicts the rationale o…
Current Concepts in Uveal Melanoma (Developments in Ophthalmology) Uveal melanoma is an aggressive form of cancer that can involve the iris, the ciliary body, and/or the choroid, which is the main …
This digital document is an article from Ear, Nose and Throat Journal, published by Thomson Gale on September 1, 2007. The length …
Melanoma Development: Molecular Biology, Genetics and Clinical Application The book provides comprehensive insights into molecular changes in malignant melanoma. The general mechanisms of melanoma growth …
Melanoma: Prevention, Detection, and Treatment; Second Edition (Yale University Press Health & Wellness) The incidence of melanoma has increased by 2000% since 1930, and one person dies each hour from the disease. This cutting-edge gui…
Related Topics
Tags: Cancer, cured, Fungus, Testimonial
Vitamin d cures the flu and many other diseases. Your body uses it to make antimicrobial peptides which kill viruse, bacteria, fungi, cancer. A cure without the side effects of drugs, vaccines, chemo, etc. Check out the science.
@markgg1 Actually, there is. Go take a university course or something, man. It’s all basic micromechanics that has indeed been proven. The fact that you don’t think it is shows how unbelievably out of touch with reality you are, which is sad.
@asherasator yep sorry, you gave neutral Phs, didnt notice.
I’ve never doubted that life came from non life billions of years ago, but this cannot happen in bodies. That is impossible.
@markgg1 Also Y are animals, bacteria, viruses etc. studied for human comparison & purposes? Bcus there r some parallel observations & comparisons & things to be learned from. Photosynthesis happened & happens it appeared from ‘nowhere’ but explained in the absorption of EM frequencies in chlorophyll. Anyways it doesn’t matter. What is ur theory for primordial life?
@markgg1 & I said “toying” meaning thought about, not completely believe in or can prove. Also the 6.7-7.3 is generality around the pH of sodium which bacteria use in moderate amount for H+ & since the body is water (7) & salt it’s the perfect breeding ground for most of the common blood flora. Cheesus is this stuff too hard too understand or imagine? Any extremes of pH kill most bacteria, yes there r a few that can thrive, why is pickling done? Come on man ur being a little too oppositional.
@markgg1 R u just an argumentive person? I cud say the sky is blue & u wud disagree. The 6.7-7.3 is a GENERALITY, meaning around neutral. Only certain bacteria like the extremes of pH like Thiobillus Ferroxidans @ 1& Vibrio Cholera as high as 9 or H.Pylori in the stomach. Cheesus ur anal & if it ain’t in a book or local college u can’t imagine anything, u have no creativity or pioneering ability. The body is the source for the ‘material & energy’, just like theories of primordial life.
@asherasator Bacteria dont like PH of 6.7-7.3 (seriously, where are you getting this info?). Bacteria are extremelly diverse, and some strand like alkali, some like acids… but al living things generally like neutral because it is stable.
Now you have gone from claims without evidence, to simple madness. How on god’s green earth do you propose Bacteria ‘appear’ in the body. This is absurd! The information for bacteria is vastly complex. Where would the genes and DNA come from?
@markgg1 I’ve toyed with idea some bacteria in the body ‘Spontaneously Appear’ from nowhere (the Apeiron of Anaximander). Theres materials & energy within & around cells to appear. Kinda like the idea ammonia, carbon dioxide & water triggered by a lightning strike created primordial life, or photosynthesis with chlorophyll. But those concepts r even more on the fringe. Bacteria love sodium with a pH of 6.7-7.3 which builds charge on cells & is in physical abundance.
@asherasator ok
@markgg1 Standard medicine has no choice besides drugs & usually invasive procedures, the side effects from drugs in many cases produce more complications, then those r given more drugs, then more complications & more drugs etc. The logic is “the benefits vs the condition” but in serious illness MDs can’t differentiate where the medically induced sickness is from an original condition & it’s being swept under the rug. Surgeries that r wrong, the reality is worse than the movie Hostel & horror
@markgg1 I know so many MDs that were involved with my family & friends that shud be imprisoned for what they’re doing. One of my best friends is dead now from a complete screw up & complications brought on that cudv been prevented. My grandmother is dead from 2 completely stupid MDs with mis-diagnosis & surgery that in the end were proven incorrect & completely unecessary. I cud go on & on most MDs kill hundreds of ppl in their careers with mis-diagnosis, drugs & treatment & that is a fact.
@markgg1 A drug alone will NEVER cure all forms of cancer bcus they’re all different. My opinion is a high animal protein diet is contributing to alot of these problems. Its complicated when everyone I see from medical professional to average schmos pretty much have an incomplete education, don’t know how to eat right, bad habits & just plain stupid. They’re bringing it on themselves. I tell everybody with a medical problem “U did it to urself” & when I analyse in detail the facts prove it
@markgg1 The truth is hospitals & oncologist r destroying many cells & tissues with an uncontrollable weapon. & it is killing in some cases faster than the cancer. I know a guy who had tumors surgically removed, changed his diet & they never came back, did nothing else. There has to be a merger of some alternative practices that have a good track record with medical institutions. What’s being done now is not enuff, It has to be dietary, supplemental & maybe surgical if tumors r too large.
@markgg1 I kno the way flaky ppl sometimes present alternative ideas & bring up yoga & other mind body things (which some may have truth) doesn’t look good from a scientific perspective. Especially if 1 doesn’t believe in any of that or r atheistic etc. But the only reason it comes thru those channels is bcus that standard institutions don’t do anything else, u have some cancer centers that focus on nutrition etc. & may have some positive results but a lot r standard.
@markgg1 I just listened to 2 interviews with Gina, she is not dead bcus of Simoncini, the chemo treatment ate away a great portion of her stomach before he did anything with him. She was very sick by the time she went to him, cervical cancer & colon. In the interview she looks very sick. I know so many where chemo didn’t help & completely destroyed them. Getting rid tumors isn’t enuff. Chemo is totally incorrect as a treatment & most know it, they just don’t kno what else to do.
@asherasator Im not claiming any of them are liars, but they are being conned by a fraud. One lady you may have heard of is called Gina Camuti. She went to Simanicci, and is now dead from Cancer.
Seems as if the miracle cure works some of the time, just like proven therapies.
The funny thing is many people have been cured completely by chemo, but a doctor will never say that to a patient because he has the integrity to know there is a small chance it will return. Simonicci should be imprisoned
@markgg1 I’ve provided an incredible amount of things, uv provided nothing proving those claims (the actual ppl cured etc.) themselves wrong or an alternative explanation for their cure. Uv only denied the ability to cure in that manner yet showed nothing with the actual ppl as liars, or still sick thinking theyr cured yet no symptoms r evident. PROVE SOMETHING AGAINST THE ACTUAL PPL. Show something besides a formula, equation or textbook elementary study. This has been a full week of u & me.
@markgg1 None of these ideas go against the laws, rules & what is known of the most basic aspects of biochemistry, microbiology, molecular biology. They just use the full playing field as resources instead of only drugs or invasive treatments, which is the narrow tunnel-vision those that read Skeptical Inquirer believe in, they think theyr some how more scientific denying everything they don’t understand. Just bcus someone doesn’t believe something doesn’t mean it isn’t true. History proves it
@markgg1 What u failed to understand for alternative therapy which involve diet is how it can affect the cellular level, which in turn affect the RNA & DNA level which loop right back to the cellular etc. >∞. Basic nutrition & food r so important to enzyme activity & metabolism its ridiculous & can have all sorts of anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, ant-parasitical, anti-microbial properties, WHICH MOST BASICALLY TRAINED IN COMMON MEDICINE NO NOTHING ABOUT. Yet this is so simple it’s elementary.
@markgg1 My theory isn’t “made up” it’s explaining exactly what ppl r doing, it’s like reverse engineering. They’re neutralizing acid & killing microorganisms & viruses & RNA & DNA sometimes reflect it, REGARDLESS WHICH WAY IT’S DONE. Some of the cancers r mold, fungi & parasites (or combination of all of em) triggering the response @ times leaving a genetic blueprint which ur so focused on. SOME METHODS INVOLVE DRUGS, SOME ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES & HAVE PARALLEL CONCEPTS. THAT IS THE REALITY
@markgg1 YES A HEALTHY PERSONS WHOLE SYSTEM IS IDEAL, SICK PPL R NOT IDEAL CHEMICALLY, THAT’S Y THEYR SICK. TIME IN A SICK STATE TAKES ITS TOLL CREATES IMBALANCES OF A VARIETY OF RATIOS. ALL UR EXPLANATION R FROM A BASIC FOUNDATIONAL POSITION. NOT FROM A EXPONENTIALLY UNDERSTOOD POINT WITH THE SICKNESS WREAKING HAVOC. U KEEP THINKING CANCEROUS SICK PPL FUNCTION LIKE NORMAL HEALTHY PPL. AFTER A CERTAIN POINT THEY DO NOT. WHAT THE FUCK IS SO DIFFICULT UNDERSTANDING THAT?
@markgg1 No the basic logic escaped u that bicarbonate 8.2 does not kill ALL cells in a dangerous way & HAS BEEN PROVEN DELIVERED TO THE TUMOR & ERADICATED IT! R THEY ALL LIARS? ALL THE PPL IN THE WORLD WHO’VE CURED THEMSELVES, INCLUDING PPL I’VE KNOWN OR BY SIMONCINI R ALL LIARS? IF THEYR NOT LIARS THEN THEY PROVE UR THEORY WRONG.
Ur pH description is of a healthy person, not 1 who’s been sick after awhile, that’s what ur missing
ALL I’VE DONE IS SHOWN U & EXPLAINED WHAT U DON’T UNDERSTAND
@asherasator Detegetns obviously kill cancer cells, as well as normal cells.
I bet my mortgage that these detergetn experiments were done in a petri dish, and not a human being.
I could get a bunch of cancer cells, set them on fire, or bleach them or they will die. But a drug must be able to be inside a human body and not kill it…. this basic logic seems to escape you,.
@asherasator WHen did I deny that the immune system plays a part in Cancer?
Lets backtrack to the beginning.
You stated that a large proportion of cancers are due to the immune system attacking microorganisms. This is untrue.
Yes, the immune system can be involved in cancer and yes, epigenetics can be also.
BUT IT ALL STEMS FROM A GENETIC MUTATION.
A mutated protein can cause innappropriate epigenetic pringint.
You are citing things I agree with already, yet u interpret it incorrectly